🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a draft bill that include reductions in the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during expanded apprehension about industry interference with medical guidelines. Last month, international health experts sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of business advocacy worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be lowered to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than one year after the legislation is approved.

The WHO in fact recommends a warning should cover at least 50% of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for different infractions “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

In the letter, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia says the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We exist in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and harvest that and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Public health laws in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator commented: “The company operates its business in compliance with current country statutes. Additionally, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which allow for interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that minors should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to achieve intended public health goals, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, noting that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which includes growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.