🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. This production, however, could coincide so closely with the mythologized image promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a compliment instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Strongman

For years, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have worked together to forge a tailor-made version of Putin. This character is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a TV series released last October, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “rescue” Russia from chaos. Although the character's name a different name, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in buttressing this identical story instead of debunking it. An adaptation based on a popular book sets out to subvert the Putin cult by presenting him as a symptom but as a symptom, shifting the focus to the spin doctors around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, the president is presented as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and all but beg him to become president. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking permanent power.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. In reality, these events took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one actually pleaded with him to accept the role. The presidency was effectively a selection process with no shortage of contenders. Central to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who expected to run the state de facto.

• The shortlist featured various figures, including an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• According to an expert who studied his rise, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman close to the events said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not involved with actual agent work.

Interestingly, the move to depicting him as a “spy” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s debut as 007. His harder interpretation prompted local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with their leader. Edited images swapping the actor's likeness with Putin’s surfaced on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its omission of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen directly. His influence is signaled through photographs or orders from on high. Now, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.